The Blockchain Association has urged the Senate to advance the CLARITY Act, rejecting claims it weakens AML rules as lawmakers face the August recess.
Just three days before the Senate begins its August recess, the Blockchain Association (BA) has sent an urgent letter to Senate Majority Leader John Thune and Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, arguing that recent criticism of the bill is based on misunderstandings rather than its actual language.
The response comes after the National Sheriffs' Association (NSA) warned lawmakers that the legislation could weaken anti-money laundering (AML), sanctions, and Know-Your-Customer (KYC) rules by creating broad exemptions for parts of the crypto industry.
According to the Blockchain Association, the sheriffs' letter wrongly describes what the CLARITY Act actually does.
The industry group said the legislation does not exempt decentralized finance (DeFi) protocols, crypto mixers, blockchain bridges, software developers, or user interfaces from AML or sanctions laws.
Instead, it argues the bill continues to regulate businesses that control customer assets while protecting developers who simply build software.
Lindsay Fraser, the Blockchain Association's chief policy officer, said correcting the record was essential because a Senate floor vote could happen soon.
The Association also stressed that the CLARITY Act creates "rigorous obligations" for financial intermediaries while giving law enforcement stronger tools to investigate crypto-related crime.
Much of the controversy centers on Section 10604, better known as the Blockchain Regulatory Certainty Act (BRCA).
The provision creates a safe harbor for non-custodial blockchain developers, making it clear they should not automatically be treated as money transmitters simply because they write or publish software.
The National Sheriffs' Association has asked lawmakers to remove or narrow this section, arguing that it could create loopholes for bad actors.
The Blockchain Association, however, disagrees.
It argues that the bill draws a clear line between companies that actually control customer funds and developers who only provide neutral software.
Under the proposal, exchanges, custodians, brokers, and other intermediaries would still be required to follow AML, KYC, and Bank Secrecy Act rules, while software developers without control over transactions would not face bank-style compliance requirements.
The Blockchain Association also pushed back against suggestions that law enforcement broadly opposes the CLARITY Act.
Its letter says organizations including the Fraternal Order of Police, the National Organization of Black Law Enforcement Executives, the Major Cities Chiefs Association, and the Federal Law Enforcement Officers Association have supported the legislation.
It also noted that the Major County Sheriffs of America withdrew its earlier opposition and adopted a neutral position.
According to the Association, this shows the National Sheriffs' Association's position does not represent the entire law enforcement community.
The Senate is expected to leave Washington for its August recess this week, leaving only a short window for lawmakers to move the legislation forward. If the bill fails to advance before the break, its path could become much more difficult as Congress shifts its attention toward the election season.
The CLARITY Act has already cleared the House with 294-134 bipartisan support and previously advanced through the Senate Banking Committee.
However, it still needs at least 60 Senate votes before it can move ahead, while political disagreements over crypto oversight continue to delay a final floor vote.
For the crypto industry, the next few days could prove decisive, as the odds of the Crypto Clarity Act passing have dropped to 36%.
No comments yet
Be the first to share your take when accounts launch.
